(Note: Serve this NOTICE
on "Agencies", extortionists, Captors,
Pirates; Ransomers, "Jailers", or "police" - not on Court)
"NOTICE OF NON APPEARANCE" based upon NO UNDERSTANDING and NO CONSENT based
upon
"I did NOT "understand", - if and
when I did sign anything, and you have to prove I did understand". (See
Garrett v. Moore McCormack Co.)
"An Appearance induced by Fraud (legal coercion,
physical duress, or fictitious party) has no efficacy" (Stultz v. Stultz, 94A.2d 527,
24 N.J.Super, 354, 6 C.J.S. §18)
per Court Rule 12 (b) (1) "MOTION TO DISMISS due to lack of jurisdiction. (Do NOT
touch the issue)
"Holding or detaining beyond 48 hours without
"charging" or "booking" is unlawful" per COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
vs. McLAUGHLIN 111 S.Ct 1661 (1991)
1. U.S. vs. IKE KOZMINSKY et al
487 US 931, 934 (no involuntary servitude)
2. GARRETT vs. MOORE-McCORKACK Co. 317
U.S. 238 (no full understanding = no meeting of minds = no intent)
3. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE vs.
McLAUGHLIN 111 S.Ct 1661 (1991) (No incarceration beyond 48 hours without
"charging" or "booking")
4. MIRANDA vs. ARIZONA 384 U.S. 436 "You have the right to remain silent (and
NOT make "Appearance" by a statement) or the court will appoint a Lawyer for
you, who will make an "Appearance" for you and grant the Court
"Jurisdiction" for you.
Note: We must file with Court: 1. "OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION" (failure to
(object] reserve your rights,- waives your rights).
2. "DEMAND TO DISMISS" due to lack of jurisdiction (no consent to use
"Code") and denial of "Due Process" therefor, due to no
"consent". (per Court Rule 12 (b) (1) MOTION TO DISMISS
-no jurisdiction)
signed,
Dated: August 25, 1998
Accused/Detainee
real live flesh and blood Natural Man
Private Party Foreign State
Non "corporate fiction person subject"
|
