|
| |
| Article - Testimonial "real
live man, or FICTION ? - "It Ain't Me." "
This "Letter" (with Papers Returned) saved me $12,000.00 and/or jail by:
David S. DeRiemer, - Peoples Rights Association c/o, - 1624 Savannah Rd.A.B., Lewes,
Delaware No zip used
I received (all rights reserved/without prejudice to rights) by mail, Nine (9)
letters/"Statements of Amounts Due" in Nine (9) separate envelopes from the
"Court". They said "pay the amount due, or there will be a "Contempt
Of Court" HEARING, Wednesday at 1:30 p.m., for failure to pay", and I would go
to jail.
After photocopying the envelopes and their contents, - I marked the envelopes "Opened
by Mistake" (per State and U.C.C. section 1-103 "Underlying fundamental
principles of Law"), and marked "Return to Sender" on each envelope, and
they were each "Returned" by the Post Office.
I then sent CERTIFIED MAIL (all rights reserved) the enclosed "It Ain't
Me" letter (with copies of the returned Marked numbered envelopes attached as
exhibits). It said that the Defendant is a fiction - since I am not a fiction "It
ain't me". The Defendant spells its name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS -
since I spell my name with lower case letters "It ain't me". The Defendant's
"address" is at a fiction zone titled "DE". Since I
have no contact, no contract, no nexus, and no connection to fiction zone "DE",
- "It Ain't me". The Defendant's #'address" is at a
fiction zone number 19958. Since I have no contract, no contact, no nexus, and no
connection to fiction zone 19958, - "It ain't me". Since it is against the law
for me to accept or keep Mail or papers, especially legal papers, that are apparently
intended for another, it would be Mail Fraud for me to keep them, so they are refused,
rejected and "Returned To Sender", envelope copies attached hereto. If it is in
fact me, the real live natural flesh and blood Man of GOD who you wish to contact, - spell
my name with lower case letters, my "temporary Mail Location" is "Care
of" 1624 Savannah Road, Lewes, Delaware (spelled fully out)
and NO VOLUNTARY ZIP CODE USED, just as it appears on thin "In Forma
Pauperis" form.
We suspected that if I "failed to appear" they would simply send out a "SWAT
TEAM" to personally arrest me an forcibly bring me in, - so on Wednesday,I
walked into the Courtroom at 1:30. The room was dark and empty.
I went down to the Court Clerk's Office to inquire. They said "Wait a minute"
and telephoned to the Chief Clerk. I waited out in the lobby and when she saw me, she said
"Oh, Mr. DeRiemer, what are You doing here?". I said "Well, you mailed
these nine (9) NOTICES that there was to be a HEARING here now". She
said "But, - you sent the NOTICES back." [In other words
"BECAUSE you sent the NOTICES back, We did not obtain "Service
of Process".]
I then said, "Well, now that I am here, I would like to talk to the Judge."
She said "What about?"
I said "I have this 'In Forma Pauperis' Form here and I'd like to talk to him
about it."
She
said "Can I see it?". I said "Sure". She said, "Well, If you want
him to look at it, we better "clock
I said, "How about "clock" my copy in also, to prove that I was here at the
appointed hour and date. Also, I would like a written statement on Court Stationery that I
was here, and that No "Capias" (Bench Warrant) will be issued later today."
She said "O.K., but how will we notify you when the HEARING on this In Forma
Pauperis is scheduled, as you don't get your mail."
I said, "sure I do. just spell my Name in lower case letters, use "Care
of" before the "Mail Location", fully
spell out "Delaware", and use NO ZIP CODE NUMBER, and it will get to me
just fine.
She gave me one of those sickening sweet Government employee all knowing
"smiles", and went down the Hall toward her office. I began to follow, but she
said "Just wait out here, and I'll be right back."
23 minutes later - she appeared with a single sheet of Court Letterhead paper with two (2)
sentences on it. The FIRST ENTIRE SENTENCE WAS IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, AND SAID
"DAVID S. DERIEMER (no address or "temporary Mail location" at all), HAD
APPEARED AND NO CAPIAS WOULD BE ISSUED, AT THIS TIME."
The second (2nd) sentence was in all lower case letters, and said that the Hearing on
the "In Forma Pauperis" form, would be heard two weeks -from that date
Monday morning at 9:30 a.m. (The "In Forma Pauperis" said that I didn't own the
House that I thought I owned; I didn't own the car that I thought I owned; I didn't own
any cash in my pocket that I thought I owned; I didn't own the money that I thought was in
the Bank; I didn't own my physical Body which I thought I owned,- or my wife, or my
children, or anything). It was signed Without prejudice" in case I had made a
"Mistake", so it couldn't be introduced into evidence in any court proceeding
anyway.
The First HEARING was to have been about "Contempt of Court" with pending jail
time. Now, we are talking "In Forma Pauperis" HEARING.
It is similar to a "Counter-Complaint", - and that a Defendant Cannot do the
impossible (since "No Money" in circulation), and a Court cannot be
"unreasonable" by Ordering the impossible or penalizing one for failure to
perform the impossible.
Two (2) weeks went by and Friday afternoon at 2:30 p.m., my wife received a telephone
call from the Judge's Personal Secretary not just the Clerk. She said "Your Husband
need not come to court Monday morning, because the Judge has decided to "Take it
under Advisement'.
We suspected that they wanted to trick me into "failure to appear" so they could
dismiss my "In Forma Pauperis". So, I called her back and asked her to repeat
the message, which she did. I then asked for a letter of written confirmation of the phone
call, which she did send.
That has been almost one (1) year ago, and we have not heard anything about either
the "Contempt of Court" or the "In Forma Pauperis" since.
CONCLUSIONS: The Judge had been put into a"catch 22" situation.
They didn't obtain "Service of Process" on the fiction ALL CAPITAL LETTER
NAME Defendant so they couldn't proceed against it, and they had a "Petition for In
Forma Pauperis from a party who is not the Defendant and is not privy to the case/suit.
The judge couldn't hear the Petition from a non-party to the case.
The
distinction is between a FICTION, or a real live natural flesh and blood man of GOD.
Because government is a fiction corporation, - it can only have cognizance of other
FICTIONS. This is the reason that "Taxpayer License/ Taxpayer I.D.#/ Social Security
Numbers" and "Driver Licenses" (etc.) are only issued to FICTIONS, which
have their names spelled in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
Government FICTIONS cannot have contact or acknowledge real live natural people. They can
only contact fiction "persons". "People" are real, "persons"
are fictions.
They might have sent over some "Constable" or "Sheriff" to personally
serve the "Court Papers" on real live me, but that wouldn't have worked either.
|
|
