| Notice, when they
accuse one of something criminal, - they never accuse you of violating a "Law".
They can't Their private "Lawyer-club meetings" are convened "in the
interest of justice", and/or "discretion" under the "Administration
(collection of debt) of Code". That's why, -
even if you go out and flat-out kill someone, - they will not accuse you of
"Murder". They will accuse you of violation of some "Code Title number and
section number" which stands for murder.
What they refer to as "criminal" is actually "civil-criminal". It is
really a "Contract penalty" or penal Code violation, being
"administered" to fiction persons under presumption that you (We) are
enjoying some "Benefit, Privilege, Title of Nobility, or opportunity offered" by
government corporation. The "It Ain't Me" letter raises "rebuttable
presumption" that you (the real live natural man), are not the fiction person
Defendant - despite the similar name. The important issue here is the distinction between
"real" versus "fiction". The fact that the fiction's name is spelled
in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, is only prima facie evidence that it is the fiction.
The main issue is that you are nor the fiction Defendant of a Legislature. You are real
flesh & blood natural of GOD.
Example, - we had a man go into court, but he argued the name spelling (small letters vs.
Capital letters). The tricky Lawyer-Judge finally said "Well then, what is your
name?". He gave his name verbally (making a contract with the court). The sneaky
tricky Judge then said "Let the record show the Defendant is Mr. Blank 'also known
as' Mr. BLANK." She had Just by-passed the "real. vs. fiction" issue. Do
NOT get hung-up on the spelling". That is secondary. The main issue is - are
you real natural flesh and Blood of GOD, or a fiction corporate "person" of
government, and a "subject" therefore.
When they called his case, - What our Man should have
said is "Which one? The real man or the fiction? . And repeated that
phrase over and over, regardless how many times and different ways they tried to call him.
Enjoying the "Title of Nobility" as
"Person" and/or "subject" is a privilege granted from government
and makes you liable and subject to to' government "Code of Conduct" for
"subjects". The lawyers presume that everyone is enjoying the benefit of
corporate fiction subject" (14th Amendment, "slave on government
plantation") status and therefore owes a debt back to government (excise Tax) in
return for the privilege/Benefit being enjoyed.
When one returns or "rejects" all government
papers, refuses to enter a "Plea", and refuses to "Post Bail or Bond"
(for 48 hours Riverside County vs. McLaughlin), and Denies by WRITTEN AFFIDAVIT that he is
the fiction Defendant, they can NOT proceed and can NOT hold you, beyond that 48 hours.
And, yes, you can sue for false imprisonment,(later) for the 48 hour "unlawful
detention" of a Non-fiction Subject. |
